There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self.
Ernest Hemingway
Hemingway’s perspective that there is ‘nothing noble in being superior’ challenges our devotion to hierarchy. He does not argue that there are no differences between men, but rather that the enforcement of these differences over others is not ‘noble’. There is something more true, more practical about the man who seeks his own development compared to the false idol of personal superiority. There is a human tendency towards hierarchy, apparent in the dangers of nationalism to the layers of superiority found even in small, niche groups. Sharon Traweek found hierarchies even in the culture of high-energy physicists, with theoretical physicists viewing themselves as more senior than experimental physicists, who in turn considered themselves more senior than data analytical scientists. This article argues that the existence of hierarchies in communities and groups can be harmful, resulting in judgmental behaviour, failure to listen and understand and a tendency to impose views. These issues of hierarchy are particularly damaging in social policy, including healthcare, housing and immigration, where they can result in ineffective programmes and the allocation of people to defined roles in society of either ‘giver’ or ‘recipient.’ The ‘givers’, the state, charities and ‘recipients’, groups or individuals, then become separated and stuck, repeating the same roles, with increasing dependence, loss of agency and disappointing outcomes. To address the issues resulting from these hierarchies, this article proposes a new approach, a ‘switching of hats’, whereby people deliberately and visibly move positions within the hierarchy, from ‘recipient’ to ‘giver’ or from ‘giver’ to ‘recipient’, to create greater empathy and understanding. This approach, over time, can break down the idea of hierarchy, superiority and separation. It offers the opportunity to transform the impact of social policies, the efficiency of government, the effectiveness of charities and the livelihood, the sense of worth and the ‘nobility’ of individuals.
(more…)